Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 05600
Original file (BC 2012 05600.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2012-05600

		COUNSEL:  NONE

		HEARING DESIRED:  NO


________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His 14 October 2012 Fitness Assessment (FA) score be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS).

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

His FA failure was due to the consumption of cold medication which caused dizziness and shortness of breath.  Although he notified the Fitness Assessment Cell (FAC) of his medical condition, his score was inadvertently entered into the AFFMS.  Therefore, his commander later deemed the FA invalid.  

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant is currently serving in the Air National Guard (ANG) in the grade of staff sergeant (E-5).

On 14 October 2012, the applicant participated in the contested FA.  He attained a composite score of 40.00 after receiving the following component scores:  abdominal circumference – 20.00 points, push-ups – 10.00 points, sit-ups – 10.00 points, and cardio – 0.00 points.  As the applicant was unable to complete the cardio portion of the FA, the FAC notified him of his responsibilities under the Fitness Assessment Did Not Finish (FADNF) process.  He had the option of being medically evaluated, but his test would still count unless rendered invalid by his unit commander based on medical evaluation results.  The applicant acknowledged that he had been made aware of his responsibilities under the FADNF process.

On 16 October 2012, the applicant’s commander indicated he was aware that the applicant did not complete the FA and was seeking to be evaluated medically in accordance with AFI 36-2905, Fitness Program.  

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application is described in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C.  

________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial, indicating the applicant has not displayed a clear error or injustice.  In accordance with Air Force Instruction (AFI) 36-2905, Fitness Program, if an airman becomes injured or ill during the FA and is unable to complete all required components, he/she will have the option of being evaluated at the medical treatment facility (MTF) but his/her test will still count unless rendered invalid by the unit commander.  Fitness assessment cell (FAC) staff will hold scores of non-Active Guard and Reserve (AGR) and Air Reserve Component (ARC) airmen for up to one month and enter them into AFFMS on the 30th day if the commander does not invalidate the test results.  In this case, while the applicant has provided a copy of his FADNF letter, which was provided to the commander, it is not complete.  The applicant’s illness was not validated by the medical treatment facility (MTF), nor has the commander indicated his determination to validate/invalidate the FA.  Therefore, the FA score in AFFMS does not reflect an error or injustice.  

A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit C.

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 17 February 2013 for review and comment within 30 days.  As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D).  

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice.  We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice.  Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application.

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.

________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2012-05600 in Executive Session on 19 September 2013, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	Chair
	Member
	Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

     Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 3 November 2012, w/atchs.
     Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
     Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 11 February 2013.
     Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 17 February 2013.

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05745

    Original file (BC 2012 05745.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Had the applicant discontinued the cardio component of the FA when he fell ill, he would have been briefed on the option to seek medical attention, which would (or could) have resulted in his commander invalidating the FA and allowing him to retest. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 27 Sep 13, for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit C). We...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02692

    Original file (BC 2013 02692.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. A list of the applicant’s last five FA results is as follows: Date Composite Score Rating 26 Jul 2013 79.30 Satisfactory *30 Apr 2013 36.50 Unsatisfactory 12 Oct 2012 81.90 Satisfactory 3 Oct 2012 71.60 Unsatisfactory 15 May 2012 Exempt Exempt *Contested FA On 7 Jan 14, a similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessments Appeals Board (FAAB), on the basis of “Insufficient evidence; specifically no...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02587

    Original file (BC 2013 02587.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his claim, the applicant has submitted a letter from his UFPM and a Standard Form 600, Chronological Record of Medical care, indicating that he had an illness, precluding him from finishing and passing the contested FA and memorandum from his UFPM (not dated) to the Force Support Squadron commander requesting removal of the contested FA from AFFMS. If an AF Form 422 is required, an additional 7 days will be allowed for the AF Form 422 to be generated and provided.” A list of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02521

    Original file (BC 2013 02521.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Along with his personal statement, the applicant provided a memorandum from his medical provider that validates he had a medical condition that precluded him from achieving a passing score on the contested FA. On that same memorandum, the applicant’s medical provider indicated he had a “documented medical condition that precluded him/her from achieving a passing score in a non-exempt portion of the FA test.” IAW AFI 36-2905; Atch 1, Para 10, “If an Airman becomes injured or ill during the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02580

    Original file (BC 2013 02580.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A list of the applicant’s complete FA history is as follows: Date Composite Score Cardio Rating 4 Aug 2013 33.00 17:41/0.00 Unsatisfactory *5 May 2013 26.50 INC/0.00 Unsatisfactory 14 May 2012 91.70 12:19/57.60 Satisfactory * Contested FA On 16 Dec 13, a similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessments Appeals Board (FAAB), on the basis of “Insufficient evidence; specifically AF Form 422 and medical...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03180

    Original file (BC 2013 03180 .txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03180 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Fitness Assessment (FA) dated 15 Aug 12 be removed from his records. The applicant contends that he suffered from a medical condition that precluded him from passing the contested FA and, thus, said FA should be removed from his records. While we...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03849

    Original file (BC 2013 03849.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 12 Aug 13, the applicant provided a response to the Letter of Counseling (LOC) he was issued as a result of not passing the contested FA. The applicant presents documentation of difficulty with the contested FA due an illness/injury but did not obtain an invalidation letter from his commander. We note the comments of AFPC/DPSIM indicating the applicant should have made the fitness assessment cell (FAC) staff aware that he had a medical condition that precluded him from passing the FA on...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-05735

    Original file (BC-2012-05735.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05735 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His fitness assessment (FA), dated 15 November 2012, be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03908

    Original file (BC 2013 03908.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 29 Nov 12, the applicant participated in the contested FA and failed to attain the minimum score in the cardio component. On 14 Feb 14, the Fitness Assessment Appeals Board (FAAB) disapproved the applicant’s request for relief on the basis that the applicant should not have completed the contested FAs once she became injured; additionally, the applicant did not provide a commander’s invalidation memorandum invalidating contested FAs. For Regular Air Force and AGR, they will enter the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04605

    Original file (BC 2013 04605.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04605 XXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Fitness Assessment (FA) dated 12 Sep 13 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). _______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 20 Mar...